iProcure vs Icertis
Icertis starts at the contract request. iProcure starts at the need.
Icertis is an AI-native contract lifecycle platform for Fortune 500 enterprises that starts at the contract request. iProcure starts at the purchase need and ends at the paid invoice, with contracts as one module. Icertis is the right pick for a large legal team buying CLM alone.
Last reviewed , from public sources.
What Icertis is, in their own framing
Icertis sells Icertis Contract Intelligence, an AI-native contract lifecycle management platform organised into Engage, Operate and Analyze, with Vera as its AI assistant. It is sold to Fortune 500 enterprises and focuses on the contract: from request and authoring through obligations and analysis across the portfolio.
Side by side
Where each product starts and stops
| Icertis | iProcure | |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Contract intelligence | The whole span, source-to-pay |
| Starts at | The contract request | The purchase need |
| Stops at | After signing | The paid invoice |
| RFx and auctions | Not covered | RFI, RFP and RFQ events (live); reverse auctions (demo) |
| Evaluator workspace | Not shown | Independent scoring + consensus, prices sealed until technical sign-off (demo) |
| Contract depth | AI-native CLM across Engage, Operate and Analyze | Drafting, negotiation and a repository; award to contract with obligations (demo) |
| AI | Vera, an AI assistant across the contract portfolio | Inside the step, citing its source; a human decides; it never awards or signs. Question drafting (live); further in-step help (roadmap) |
| POs and invoices | Not covered | Purchase orders and three-way match in the same record (demo) |
| Pricing | No public pricing | Modular: pay for the modules you switch on, start with two; figures shared on a call |
| Buy pattern | + Ariba/Coupa + Keelvar | One product |
Credit where due
Where Icertis leads
- Contract intelligence at enterprise scale, across very large contract portfolios.
- An AI-native CLM with a dedicated assistant, Vera, working across contracts.
- Depth across the contract lifecycle, organised into Engage, Operate and Analyze.
- Experience with Fortune 500 legal and contracting teams and their governance.
Our edge
Where iProcure leads
- Everything before the contract: intake, RFx, supplier confidentiality, evaluation by many people and the award.
- The award becomes the contract draft without retyping, and committed answers become tracked obligations (demo).
- Purchase orders and invoices in the same record, so the contract price is the price that gets paid.
- Leaders decide from the email with a one-time link, no portal login. Live today.
- Modular buying for companies of 200 to 10,000 people: start with two modules.
Honesty rule
What we don't claim
- Full CLM. Our Contracts module is a sample-data demo today.
- Contract intelligence or portfolio analytics across all contracts. On the roadmap.
- A shipped AI assistant across the contract portfolio. Our AI works inside individual steps, not across contracts.
- Fortune 500 scale deployments. We are pre-launch.
Which to pick
An honest recommendation
Pick Icertis when
Pick Icertis when you are a large enterprise with a large legal team buying CLM alone: the contract portfolio is the problem, sourcing and payments already run in other systems, and you want contract intelligence across the whole portfolio.
Pick iProcure when
Pick iProcure when procurement owns the process from purchase request to paid invoice, contracts are the output of sourcing, and you want the RFx, evaluation, award, contract, PO and invoice in one record without buying and integrating three tools.
FAQ
iProcure vs Icertis: questions
Is iProcure an Icertis alternative?
Does Icertis do sourcing, RFx or purchase orders?
How does AI in iProcure differ from Icertis Vera?
Is iProcure priced for mid-sized companies?
Next step
See it live in 10 minutes.
Pick your region and the two modules that hurt most. We run your own category through the RFx spine on sample data. No access, no commitment, no build decision required.
- Supplier-blind RFx
- Independent evaluation
- Approvals from email
- Global & modular
Design partner's seat
Pre-launch and honest about it: you get the mechanism now. Design partners get a free 60 to 90 day pilot, a preferential launch price, roadmap input and a direct line to the founders.